Daughter-In-Regulation Denied Bail In Homicide Case Of Ex-UP Chief Minister’s Son

Spread the News

[ad_1]
Daughter-In-Regulation Denied Bail In Homicide Case Of Ex-UP Chief Minister’s Son

Daughter-In-Law Denied Bail In Murder Case Of Ex-UP Chief Minister's Son

A Delhi courtroom on Tuesday dismissed a bail application of Apoorva Shukla.

New Delhi:

A Delhi courtroom on Tuesday dismissed a bail application of Apoorva Shukla, accused of killing her husband Rohit Shekhar Tiwari, the son of late veteran politician ND Tiwari.

Additional Sessions Judge Sandeep Yadav stated the accused, being a part of Rohit Shekhar Tiwari’s household, was undoubtedly able to affect the general public witnesses, who had been related to the latter’s household and but to be examined.

Whereas deciding the bail application, the place, and status of the accused need to be seen and thought of. The applicant was married to the deceased and therefore is part of the household.

“Many public witnesses related to the family of the deceased are but to be examined. Applicant (Apoorva) being a part of the household is certainly able to affect the general public witnesses who’re but to be examined,” the court stated in its order.

It additionally stated there was “scientific final seen” proof within the type of CCTV footage by which the accused was seen because the final particular person to go to the primary ground the place the homicide came about.

“The case relies on a circumstantial proof. There’s scientific final seen proof within the type of CCTV footage by which the accused (Apoorva) is seen because the final particular person to go to the primary ground the place the homicide of the deceased came about.

Subsequently, prima-facie case towards accused is obvious from the proof collected throughout the investigation and the proof that has been led to a date,” it stated.

The courtroom added that Apoorva Shukla was charged with the offense of homicide beneath part 302 of the India Penal Code, which was a severe offense punishable with the death penalty.

It additionally noted that arguments of Apoorva Shukla’s counsel on the bail plea primarily targeted the deserves of the case and referred to the deposition of assorted witnesses who’ve already been examined.

It’s settled regulation {that a} detailed examination of the proof that has come on the report just isn’t warranted whereas deciding the bail utility as it could prejudice the case of the prosecution or of the accused,” the court stated.

Throughout the listening to, advocate Mehmood Pracha, showing for Apoorva Shukla, stated that 11 witnesses, together with materials witnesses, have been examined and therefore there was no risk of any witnesses being influenced by the accused.

He additionally claimed that Rohit Shekhar’s mom was knowledgeable by the police as to who had murdered her son and therefore her testimony was primarily based on her perception.

He stated that the accused was most involved in regards to the well-being of her husband.

Additional Public Prosecutor L D Singh opposed the bail plea, saying Apoorva didn’t inform the police instantly after seeing her husband in a foul situation.

He additional stated that as per the assertion of the accused recorded when she was not even a suspect, she was alleged with the Rohit Shekhar between 12 am to three am and as per the postmortem report, the death had taken place throughout this era.

Rohit Shekhar’s mom Ujjwala Tiwari, who was represented by advocate Tariq Nasir and Manav Narula, had earlier alleged that relations turned tense between the couple instantly after their marriage and he or she fought with him on trivial points.

Rohit Shekhar’s was smothered to death on the intervening night time of April 15 and 16 final yr, the post-mortem report had stated.

[ad_2]


Spread the News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: